NCEAS Project 11103
Making decisions on complex environmental problems
- Helen M. Regan
- Sahotra Sarkar
| Activity | Dates | Further Information |
|---|---|---|
| Working Group | 31st January—4th February 2007 | Participant List |
| Working Group | 3rd—7th December 2007 | Participant List |
| Working Group | 9th—13th June 2008 | Participant List |
| Working Group | 15th—19th November 2008 | Participant List |
Abstract
Environmental scientists must often facilitate complex decision-making based on scientific data but subject to societal and other constraints on management options. Complexity arises from: (i) multiple, often incommensurable, criteria that must be incorporated into decisions; (ii) decisions that must reflect the often conflicting long- and short-term goals of multiple stakeholders; and (iii) decisions that must be made in the presence of risk and uncertainty. The purpose of this project is to characterize scenarios for environmental decision-making and develop a conceptual taxonomy of them; review existing methods for dealing with multiple criteria and objectives, multiple stakeholders, and risk and uncertainty; develop integrated protocols for the use of these methods for complex decision making scenarios in conservation, wildlife management and/or environmental science; develop software tools for some of the methods for which existing tools are inadequate; test protocols and tools against available data sets; and identify areas in which more research is needed.
| Type | Products of NCEAS Research |
|---|---|
| Presentations | Colyvan, Mark. 2008. Aggregating beliefs: Consensus versus compromise. Society for Risk Analysis Workshop Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 29 September 2008. |
| Presentations | Colyvan, Mark. 2008. Consensus among expert. Society for Risk Analysis Conference at the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, 30 September 2008. |
| Presentations | Colyvan, Mark. 2009. The conservation game. 10th International Congress of Ecology: Ecology in a Changing Climate, Brisbane, Australia, 20 August 2009. |
| Presentations | Colyvan, Mark. 2009. The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable. International Society for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 14 July 2009. |
| Journal Article | Colyvan, Mark; Justus, James; Regan, Helen M. 2010. The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable. Vol: 3. Pages 224-228. (Online version) |
| Journal Article | Colyvan, Mark; Justus, James; Regan, Helen M. 2011. The conservation game. Vol: 144. Pages 1246-1253. (Online version) |
| Journal Article | Frank, David M.; Sarkar, Sahotra. 2010. Group decisions in biodiversity conservation: Implications from game theory. PLoS ONE. Vol: 5. Pages e10688-e10688. (Online version) |
| Presentations | Justus, James. 2008. Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental Value. Faculty Luncheon Series, Florida State University, Tallahassee, November 2008. |
| Presentations | Justus, James. 2008. Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value. Florida State University, HPS Lunchtime Seminar Series, October 2008. Tallahassee. |
| Journal Article | Justus, James; Colyvan, Mark; Regan, Helen M.; Maguire, Lynn A. 2009. Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value. Vol: 24(4). Pages 187-191. (Online version) |
| Journal Article | Justus, James; Colyvan, Mark; Regan, Helen M.; Maguire, Lynn A. 2009. Response to Sagoff. Vol: 24(12). Pages 644. (Online version) |
| Journal Article | Kuhnert, Petra M.; Martin, Tara G.; Griffiths, Shane P. 2010. A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in Bayesian ecological models. Ecology Letters. Vol: 13. Pages 900-914. (Online version) |
| Journal Article | Maguire, Lynn A.; Justus, James. 2008. Why intrinsic value is a poor basis for conservation decisions. BioScience . Vol: 58(10). Pages 910-911. |
| Book Chapter | Regan, Helen M.; Ensbey, M.; Burgman, Mark. 2009. Conservation prioritization and uncertainty in planning inputs. Edited by Moilanen, Atte; Wilson, Kerrie A.; Possingham, Hugh. Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press. |
| Report or White Paper | Steele, Katie; Colyvan, Mark; Regan, Helen M.; Burgman, Mark. 2008. Survey of group consensus methods. Australian Centre of Excellence in Risk Analysis. |