Skip to main content

National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis

Project Description

Environmental scientists must often facilitate complex decision-making based on scientific data but subject to societal and other constraints on management options. Complexity arises from: (i) multiple, often incommensurable, criteria that must be incorporated into decisions; (ii) decisions that must reflect the often conflicting long- and short-term goals of multiple stakeholders; and (iii) decisions that must be made in the presence of risk and uncertainty. The purpose of this project is to characterize scenarios for environmental decision-making and develop a conceptual taxonomy of them; review existing methods for dealing with multiple criteria and objectives, multiple stakeholders, and risk and uncertainty; develop integrated protocols for the use of these methods for complex decision making scenarios in conservation, wildlife management and/or environmental science; develop software tools for some of the methods for which existing tools are inadequate; test protocols and tools against available data sets; and identify areas in which more research is needed.
Working Group Participants

Principal Investigator(s)

Helen M. Regan, Sahotra Sarkar

Project Dates

Start: January 1, 2007

End: January 31, 2008

completed

Participants

Mark Burgman
University of Melbourne
Mark Colyvan
University of Sydney
Martin Drechsler
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
James Dyer
University of Texas, Austin
Trevon Fuller
University of Texas, Austin
James Justus
University of Texas, Austin
Mark Lubell
University of California, Davis
Lynn A. Maguire
Duke University
Christopher R. Margules
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
Tara G. Martin
University of British Columbia
Alexander Moffett
University of Texas, Austin
Helen M. Regan
University of California, Riverside
Kristina Rothley
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
Mary Ruckelshaus
NOAA, Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Sahotra Sarkar
University of Texas, Austin
Brian Skyrms
University of California, Irvine

Products

  1. Journal Article / 2014

    Voting systems for environmental decisions

  2. Presentations / 2008

    Aggregating beliefs: Consensus versus compromise

  3. Presentations / 2008

    Consensus among expert

  4. Presentations / 2009

    The conservation game

  5. Presentations / 2009

    The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable

  6. Journal Article / 2010

    The natural environment is valuable but not infinitely valuable

  7. Journal Article / 2011

    The conservation game

  8. Journal Article / 2010

    Group decisions in biodiversity conservation: Implications from game theory

  9. Presentations / 2008

    Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental Value

  10. Presentations / 2008

    Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value

  11. Journal Article / 2009

    Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value

  12. Journal Article / 2009

    Response to Sagoff

  13. Journal Article / 2010

    A guide to eliciting and using expert knowledge in Bayesian ecological models

  14. Journal Article / 2008

    Why intrinsic value is a poor basis for conservation decisions

  15. Book Chapter / 2016

    Using concepts of biodiversity in structured decision-making

  16. Book Chapter / 2009

    Conservation prioritization and uncertainty in planning inputs

  17. Report or White Paper / 2008

    Survey of group consensus methods